But if he had nothing whatsoever to do with the fight, and if one woman were defending her family against an assault by the other, then it's not demeaning, it's justified.
I agree with you, Terry - that's why I phrased my reply as I did - to indicate that if the fight were "over a man" , i.e. who gets to be with him, it's humiliating. To repeat what I wrote above: " But, hopefully Lois is wrong in this thought. )" I think, given your response above, that you agree with me, in fact, about this
Sorry I wasn't clearer though.
I do agree if Lois's opponent is in the process of assaulting a member of her family then fighting is what very easily could happen. - Heck, I'd even say force could be justified to protect Perry (Henderson of course would not need protecting, so Lois's involvement would just be gratuitous piling-on
)
c.
addit: Here's the part that made me wonder, btw: Lois's thought:
I don’t remember why. Has something to do with – with a man. But what man?
