Lois & Clark Fanfic Message Boards
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#54258 07/30/08 05:51 AM
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 92
T
Freelance Reporter
OP Offline
Freelance Reporter
T
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 92
Great update.

I'm wondering will Lois and Clark's baby be exposed to kryptonite and thats how they found out it is really their baby? Or, since you have brought up Dr. Klein, will they trust him enough to run some test to find out the paternity?

It's good that the rest of the family knows everything that has been going on.

Looking forward to reading part 50.

Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,483
Top Banana
Offline
Top Banana
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,483
You're planning to finish this in only three more chapters?!! eek


Big Apricot Superman Movieverse
The World of Lois & Clark
Richard White to Lois Lane: Lois, Superman is afraid of you. What chance has Clark Kent got? - After the Storm
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,994
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,994
Quote
Originally posted by Dandello:
You're planning to finish this in only three more chapters?!! eek
DITTO!

James


“…with God everything is possible.” Matthew 19:26.


Also read Nan's Terran Underground!
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,864
E
Merriwether
Offline
Merriwether
E
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,864
I have a feeling this will be "finished" the same way Terry Leatherwood "finished" his long road stories.

I feel it would be extremely easy to identify the babies paternity. All they need is a DNA sample from Luthor. laugh

Glad to know that Lucy and the baby are doing well, but if they think that one bottle won't hurt the baby then they don't know about how breastfeeding is established. It's important to nurse frequently in the first few weeks and to not introduce any pacifiers or bottles for the first six weeks to avoid nipple confusion (which isn't fun--trust me) and to ensure proper supply and demand (which is equally important--trust me on this one too).

Elisabeth
humbly stepping off of my soapbox

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,764
C
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
C
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,764
I happened back on for just a minute and saw this.

With four of my own that I've nursed, I do know what you mean. However, we were able to successfully give all of them bottles [very occasionally - like in the hospital immediately after birth with low blood sugar or other times when we HAD to] during that time period and they all had pacifiers before they left the hospital. Two used them frequently, two occasionally. No one knows more than me the difficulty of teaching babies to nurse [that's part of the reason we HAD to do bottles sometimes, they wouldn't get it and they HAD to get some food by that point - dehydration was becoming an issue though persevering was difficult it was more than worth it] and of supply.

IMVHO, giving her one or two bottles, even at 3 days or so, in place of one or even two feedings could easily cause no problems at all, especially if she's already doing well. Can it cause problems? Sure with some babies. I was very fortunate that none of mine were those babies [because at times, their health was literally coming into play as they struggled to learn] and something tells me theirs isn't either wink . And no - the pacifiers had nothing to do with the problems mine had. The one that had the worst problems learning to nurse, didn't really use it and the one that had the worst problems overall [DS] had medical things going on - technically speaking, he was a great nurser, but not strong enough and actually went most of the first month with both a bottle and nursing at nearly every feeding [and didn't feel I *had* to stay and nurse him *every* time - to the point where I planned shopping around it etc - if I needed to be out and about, I or DH gave him a bottle only and later went another week in the hospital at 3m with no nursing at all in an effort to carefully measure his intake].

Is it always recommended? No. Is one or two bottles make or break for nursing? IMO, not usually. I've had other friends do the same but for convenience sake [which was RARELY our motivation that young] and only one of the six [ten with mine] total babies had any problems [but that was more a mom thing than a baby thing IMO].

And a mom that can barely function after being up all night won't help matters any either =/. BTDT too... One of the things DS' doc told the nurses when I was in the hospital with him trying to figure out what was wrong was to make sure my needs were taken care of and that I got fed well and slept as well as possible because a stressed mom can effect production too. Sometimes a couple hours of sleep is worth the risk of confusion - BTDT too.

Yeah - I know that's a long response to something that's fairly trivial overall - maybe it's something I *can* defend without making half of everyone mad about my... literary? plot? whatever choices - but it is something I thought about before putting in and not something I'm uninformed about. smile

Carol

Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,627
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,627
Ditto to Dandello and James. A very big RAFO to see how this is going to wrap up!

JD


"Meg...who let you back in the house?" -Family Guy

Moderated by  Kaylle, SuperBek 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5