Thank you all for the FDK. It makes the time and effort of writing all worthwhile.
Seme, I am honoured that you came out of semi-lurkerdom to comment. Thank you!
Joan, I'm glad that part three did not disappoint.
Evelyn, if Clark made the offer to me, I'd go flying with him in an instant!
MozartMaid, I never set out to write a story of a particular length. When my muse gives me an idea, I just make the story however long it needs to be to flesh out the idea to my satisfaction. Having said that, however, I am certainly more open now to stories that need more fleshing out than I would have been in the past. I love having the speculation of what might come that is only possible with multipart stories. I am looking forward to your next story.
Laura, thanks for being such a regular reader of my stories and for consistently posting feedback.
Jenni, I have written a few revelation stories and read many, many more. I keep trying to come up with some sort of novel twist to the revelation each time I write a story. The simultaneous reveal/accuse was this story's twist.
DW, It's nice to know that if my muse deigns to give me a more complex story line, I'll have at least one reader.
SNL, If my muse obliges, I am definitely eager to write more stories. I am "between stories" at the moment. I have one brief snippet of dialogue that my muse has given me and that I really like, but it will take a lot of thinking and imagining to try to build a story around it. Here's hoping my muse cooperates...
Bellarase, And thank you for leaving FDK.
Michael, I'm glad the simultaneous reveal/accuse worked for you. At first, it stretched my own credulity briefly, but only until I remembered all of the times on the show that L&C engaged in stereophonic speech or completed each other's sentences. I figured that they had a track record of such simul-think, so why not add one more?
Joy,
Lynn