Joan, DW, and Evelyn, I'm glad you liked my explanation. Bob, wow! That was a pretty emphatic statement.
My thanks to all of you for leaving FDK.
Michael, it's always good when a story gets the reader to thinking.
Although you are right that from a purely economic standpoint, buying new furniture to replace the old doesn't make a lot of sense, I can see two reasons why Lois would buy some anyway:
1) Although she wouldn't be home enough to SIT on the sofas very much, she would pass them at least twice a day (on her way between the bedroom and the apartment door), and they are pretty to look at.
2) She had vested the old couch with symbolic value. What sort of symbolism would it be to throw that couch out and then to replace it with -- a void? How much better to replace it with a symbol of who she intends to become?
The decision to buy new couches may not be the most rational one, but Lois is not exactly in a rational frame of mind after the events of the past 24 hours.
Mellie, thanks for the explanation. You got it spot-on with the ever-present reminder.
Joy,
Lynn