Lois & Clark Fanfic Message Boards
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#93234 02/09/13 11:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Kerth
OP Offline
Kerth
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Comments go here.

Corrina. smile

#93235 02/10/13 02:58 AM
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 326
R
Beat Reporter
Offline
Beat Reporter
R
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 326
Talk about leaving us hanging. We need the next part right away!

As always I enjoyed it. Your writing is so vivid.

Kathy
http://www.chili-everyway.com/lentil-soup-recipes.html


robinson
#93236 02/10/13 03:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 411
Beat Reporter
Offline
Beat Reporter
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 411
After quite a bit of time without leaving fdk, I thought it was about time to get back on the right track.

I could quote at least half of this part, but I'm going to go right down to what for me was hands down the best part:

Quote
"As soon as Clyde and Ines see this truck, they are going to want to talk to you about joining them."

Kent's fingers had been spinning one of the wheels, but he stopped at her comment. "Are you asking me if I'm going to stay?"

"Are you?"

Kent gave a low rumble from somewhere deep in that - still bare - chest. "What do you want me to do, Lois?" he said, holding her eyes in the depth of his gaze.

"I want you to stay," she declared.

"Are you sure?"

She had never been more sure of anything in her life. "Yes."

"I … I don't know … I'm not sure if it will work."

"We'll make it work," Lois promised.
Four days. It took her only four days to break down his barriers. Which shows exactly the strenght of their bond. He didn't want to be there, he didn't even want to go on living and she had no need to help him in anyway. Yet she did and he, despite his initial detachment, let her.

Quote
Longing. Excitement. Nervousness. Confusion. Clarity. Elation. Apprehension.

He felt it, too.

This thing between them - Kent felt it, too.

But he thought she was married.
If Lois's thoughts about Clark weren't enough, the way she refers to her marriage surely shows that it isn't a conventional marriage. Though I still wonder why she didn't explain earlier on. True, Clark is a stranger and she owes him no explanation whatsoever, but surely she must have known that he'd assume hers was a conventional, loving marriage. There's no reason for him to believe otherwise.

Quote
Whatever he'd felt, the knowledge she was married would cause him to repress it. Lois was sure that, even without his experience with Lana, Kent had never been the sort of man to flout marriage vows.

Right when he should be allowing his heart to become receptive again, he would be smothering the new buds of life. He would shut down when he needed to be opening up.

He was probably feeling confused. Guilty. Ashamed, even.

She couldn't let that continue. He'd done nothing wrong.
This is exactly what we've all been thinking for quite a while; only for some reason it took Lois a little longer to get there laugh

But now I'm really hoping that Clark will let her explain. That, and that you can be bribed into posting sooner laugh . Next Sunday seems soooooo far away...


Cris
#93237 02/10/13 03:53 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
K
Hack from Nowheresville
Offline
Hack from Nowheresville
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
Poor Lois, four days with a shirtless Clark is too much for any girl's peace of mind. whinging


KateB
#93238 02/10/13 06:59 AM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,883
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,883
Hi Corrina,

Well, well, definite hints that her marriage is all that he think it is.


Herb replied, “My boy, I never say … impossible.” "Lois and Clarks"

My stories can be found here

kj
#93239 02/10/13 03:14 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,058
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,058
Nice build up of tension in the relationship. So they now know that they both feel something, but she needs to straighten him out about her sham marriage for her protection. It was probably to save her from being claimed by someone else who would not be so kind. Who knows? You do! so get over here and post the next part soon! Good job. I want more. Laura


Clark: “If we can be born in an instant, and die in an instant, why can’t we fall in love in an instant?”

Caroline's "Stardust"
#93240 02/10/13 04:52 PM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,597
Merriwether
Offline
Merriwether
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,597
Yay, I got to read the last two parts together and things are moving along so nicely. smile

I found it interesting to read all the comments for the previous chapter, how so many people are bothered by the fact that Lois clearly unashamed in her attraction to Clark ("acting single") while she's married. Yet her carefree attitude toward him is exactly why that never bothered me -- to me, it was clear that her "marriage" isn't the kind of marriage that would hold Lois back from having a romantic relationship with another man. Certainly, she grew up in the US, but she's been gone a long time ... and the fact that her marriage never enters her mind as a roadblock told me that, for reasons that we hadn't learned yet, it wasn't a roadblock. So I was glad to see that Chapter 14 just seemed to reinforce that theory.

Clearly there's more to Lois's marriage than meets the eye. I don't know what the story is yet -- perhaps all single women are considered "wives" of the chief until they are "given" to their true husbands? -- but it's clear to me that the Western definition of marriage doesn't apply here. I'm looking forward to finding out more. smile

Now Clark's marriage, that's certainly another story. But even there, I find it hard to give it more than a passing thought. Yes, he may still be legally married to Lana, but she had already either filed for divorce or was planning to do so immediately when she left him, so they are likely already legally separated. And given how the country seemed to react to his alien-ness, I wouldn't be surprised if she were able to have the courts give her a quick annulment. (Can an alien enter into a legal contract with a human?)

But even if the marriage is still legal for a time, given that neither Lois nor Clark intend to go back, it still doesn't bother me. In this case, intentions and circumstances mean much more than a piece of paper. Heck, if they didn't, then you'd also have to believe Clark was cheating on Zara by continuing his engagement to Lois after learning about New Krypton. Yet I've never seen FoLCs say that he should have broken up with Lois once Zara came to town. smile

Carry on, Corrina! I'm enjoying the heck out of this story. smile

Kathy

#93241 02/10/13 05:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
J
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
J
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
This story is really tearing me apart.

I am glad to see that Lois at least realizes that her actions are confusing Clark. I can't see how she in anyway epected him to do anything else when he figures she is married.

He also does have a point that he is married. Even if Lana abandned him, I can see his hesitancy on that front.

I just hope Matymbou can do something to see Clark's mind at ease.

I did notice this line

Quote
They were meant to be together as man and women.
I think it should end with "woman" in the singular to match man.


John Pack Lambert
#93242 02/10/13 05:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
J
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
J
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
Quote
perhaps all single women are considered "wives" of the chief until they are "given" to their true husbands?
While this could be the case, I think it creates more problems then it eliminates.

If that is all her relationship with Matymbou is, then why even bring it up? Why tell Clark about it at all.


John Pack Lambert
#93243 02/10/13 05:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
J
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
J
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
Quote
Heck, if they didn't, then you'd also have to believe Clark was cheating on Zara by continuing his engagement to Lois after learning about New Krypton. Yet I've never seen FoLCs say that he should have broken up with Lois once Zara came to town. smile
I think this is more because we see no reason at all why Clark should see as binding on him a relationship he never willingly consented to.

On the other hand, I am not sure anyone has seconded Clark's view that he should hold off from relationships because he is still legally married to Lana.

I would however point out that it has been less than a week since Lana told him that she was in a relationship with another man and leaving him. He has not really had time to emotionally move beyond the married outlook. So I don't think it is reasonable to expect him to be willing to jump into a relationship with a woman at this point. Also, since as far as he knows she is married, I think the "we're both married" is more to try to shock her into acting properly than anything else. He is very uncomfortable about being the man leading a women into adultry, being like whoever the man is who Lana went to, so he is doubly reluctant in this case.

He may have overreacted, but I would find it hard to see as in-character acting if he didn't.


John Pack Lambert
#93244 02/11/13 05:34 AM
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,597
Merriwether
Offline
Merriwether
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,597
Quote
I would however point out that it has been less than a week since Lana told him that she was in a relationship with another man and leaving him. He has not really had time to emotionally move beyond the married outlook. So I don't think it is reasonable to expect him to be willing to jump into a relationship with a woman at this point.
Oh, I absolutely agree! Clark is in no way ready to jump into a relationship with another woman right now, even if she's Lois. smile

I just meant that the fact that they are both married doesn't trouble me one bit as a reader, the way it seems to trouble other commenters. Lois and Clark may not know yet what the extenuating circumstances are in each other's marriages, but I know that there is more here than meets the eye, so I'm not worried about what it will mean for them in the bigger picture. Even if Corrina were to tell us later in the story that Lana can't finalize the divorce without Clark's signature (heh, would serve her right wink ), it wouldn't affect my belief that Clark would be doing nothing wrong by undergoing a tribal wedding at some point in the future and living with Lois as man and wife. Based on the backstory that Corrina has developed, the circumstances and intentions mean more to me in this case than any legalities.

As for your other point about why Lois would even describe "Matty" (hee, I love that she has an American pet name for him!) as her husband to Clark, that's definitely a good question. But doesn't she only say it in frustration when he won't let her break quarantine? Kind of like, "That MAN! How dare he order me around just because I haven't taken my permanent mate yet!" No idea if that's where Corrina is taking this, but it's a workable theory, at least until new details come out to contradict it.

Quote
If she explained the reasons she and Matymbou had married, was Kent going to feel as if she were trying to coerce him into something before he was ready?

She had to be the one to tell him. She had to do it before the quarantine ended.
And
Quote
"Kent," she said. "Please don't feel bad about this."

"We've been together for four days," he said, "and suddenly, you want me to cover up."

"Whatever you're thinking, you must know -"

"I know you're married. I'm married. This isn't right."

"Kent, there's something -"

"I don't want to talk about it." He pushed the shirt into her hand and walked away.
I think this whole chapter has been about telling us that Lois's "marriage" isn't what we or Clark assume when we hear the word. When she realizes that she has fallen in love with him, her response isn't "Oh no, we can't be together because I'm married!", it's "Oh, crap, he thinks I'm MARRIED-married! I need to tell him what's really going on!"

Wheeee! It's a fun ride. goofy

Kathy

#93245 02/11/13 04:03 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
J
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
J
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
It is pretty obvious that Lois is not in a conventional marriage with Matymbou.

I really don't think any of the explanations so far work. I almost thought the "maybe Matymbou acted to protect her from a marriage to some other guy" explantion might work, but I don't think Lois' interactions with Romaric fit with that.

I am guessing there are some complicated reasons for Lois' relationship, I just don't really have a clue what they are.


John Pack Lambert
#93246 02/12/13 12:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
K
Hack from Nowheresville
Offline
Hack from Nowheresville
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
I'm wondering about Lois' marriage as well. Maybe to become a legal memeber of the tribe, she had to belong to one of the families. confused Maybe it could be achieved either through adoption or marriage. huh Just thinking. laugh

KathyB, I like your idea about the chief being "a husband" of all single women. It would do good for his Ego. laugh


KateB
#93247 02/12/13 06:06 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
J
Pulitzer
Offline
Pulitzer
J
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,549
Actually though, the way Lois spoke about Matymbou and his first wife who is now dead, I almost got the impression that she is the only current wife of Matymbou. I am more sure that Clark got that impression. However, nothing so far suggests that Matymbou is a polygamist. I think I did assume that until Part 13, but what Lois said there seemed to suggest she is to only wfie.


John Pack Lambert
#93248 02/13/13 12:04 AM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
K
Hack from Nowheresville
Offline
Hack from Nowheresville
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
You are right John, no other wives were mentioned and it seems like Lois is the only one.


KateB
#93249 02/13/13 06:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Kerth
OP Offline
Kerth
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Kathy I appreciate the 'vivid' comment. I've had to concentrate on the characters rather than the setting because I've never been to the Congo.

Cristina

Quote
Though I still wonder why she didn't explain earlier on. True, Clark is a stranger and she owes him no explanation whatsoever, but surely she must have known that he'd assume hers was a conventional, loving marriage. There's no reason for him to believe otherwise.
If they are patient and medicine woman, what does it matter what he believes about her marriage? If they are (just) friends, it matters more, but even so, it's not critical.

It's only when Lois realises what she is feeling, then realises what Kent is feeling that it becomes important.

Quote
This is exactly what we've all been thinking for quite a while; only for some reason it took Lois a little longer to get there
I think there are two reasons. Lois has had four days, the readers have had 13 weeks. Also Lois isn't pre-programmed to know that Lois + Kent = love; the readers are. wink

Quote
that you can be bribed into posting sooner
See below. smile

Kate

Quote
Poor Lois, four days with a shirtless Clark is too much for any girl's peace of mind.
Good point!

Ken

Hints, yes. We'll get to a full explanation.

Laura Yes. And no. laugh

Kathy

Quote
and the fact that her marriage never enters her mind as a roadblock told me that, for reasons that we hadn't learned yet, it wasn't a roadblock.
I like your reasoning.

Quote
Carry on, Corrina! I'm enjoying the heck out of this story.
I'm glad!

John

Quote
If that is all her relationship with Matymbou is, then why even bring it up? Why tell Clark about it at all.
Initially, she didn't. Then Matymbou came to the gate, Clark asked who he was, Lois told him.

Quote
Also, since as far as he knows she is married, I think the "we're both married" is more to try to shock her into acting properly than anything else.
Do you have an example of Lois acting improperly?

Quote
He is very uncomfortable about being the man leading a women into adultry, being like whoever the man is who Lana went to, so he is doubly reluctant in this case.
I agree with your point about Clark's reluctance, but I think using the word 'adultery' for a couple who haven't even come close to a kiss yet is drawing a long bow.

KateB I enjoyed all the speculation about Lois's marriage and what it might mean for Lois/Kent. We'll see.


I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that I was working on a short Valentine's Day story. Well, it's Valentine's Day here in Oz and the story is neither short nor ready. Part 15 of OB is short, something I did deliberately because I thought I would be posting another story as well this week.

Therefore to say 'Happy Valentine's Day', I intend to post the short Part 15 this evening and you'll still get a part (16) on Sunday/Monday.

The other story will be posted eventually. Maybe we could celebrate Valentine's Day in March as well this year wink

Corrina.

#93250 02/14/13 12:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
K
Hack from Nowheresville
Offline
Hack from Nowheresville
K
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 227
If you enjoy our speculation, Corrina, you can have more. wink Diddi as an orphan needed a formal male guardian, so Diddi's mother married Matymbou. cool What do you think of that? evil


KateB
#93251 03/05/13 09:59 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Kerth
OP Offline
Kerth
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,181
Likes: 29
Not quite, Kate. But it's still a valid theory smile

Corrina.


Moderated by  Kaylle, SuperBek 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5