So, yeah, I've been reading and I haven't responded yet. (Naughty Sara, Naughty Sara!)
I guess I used the justification of I have nothing to say.
Which is actually kind of dumb, because I know that's not a good excuse from a writer's perspective!
Anyway, I'm with Lieta (also Sara...hope I realize I wasn't talking about you being naughty!
), about Clark going to Krypton.
From Lara's perspective, I can see the need to take her son to Krypton. It's his hertiage, and from her eyes, it should have been his home if she hadn't given him up. She's suffering from guilt of abbandonment, and this is her way of making it up to him.
But I hope she ASKs Clark whether he wants to go, rather than telling him, "Everything is all set! Isn't this exciting?"
Clark has a LIFE on Earth. He has responisblities. He has a family that he loves.
While it is obvious that Lara sees that, in her effort to "make it up to him", I'm not sure she understands the ramificatitons of that.
Of course, you could also make the argument that Clark has always been curious about his hertiage, as most adoptives are. And there is a big difference between a visit and returning to live. (I'm not sure which she is actually planning.)
But as Lieta said, Lois and Martha and Jonathan may not agree with the idea. And Clark has bad memories of New Kryptonians, which may make him not interested in going.
