Let me come back to Lana as Lexa. In another thread on these boards, I brought up the biblical story about King Solomon and the two harlots who wanted him to decide which of them was the mother of a living child and which of them was the mother of a dead child.
Forget the harlots thing. Neither Lois nor Lana - no, not even Lana - are close to being harlots. But both Lois and Lana have recently have children. Lois's baby survived. Lana's died.
In the biblical story, the mother of the dead child tried to steal the living child, claiming it was hers. Well, Lana is not going to mistake Christopher for her own dead daughter. But how about trying to steal him anyway? Don't we all know that
someone is going to to try to steal Christopher? Yes, we all though it was Navance. But why shouldn't Lana help him?
In the biblical story, the mother of the dead child would be happy to see King Solomon kill the other woman's living child. Because she is so jealous, she would rather see the other woman's child dead than alive.
Maybe Lana would be happy to see Christopher dead????
Or at least she wouldn't care one way or another if he died?
Well, Clark, it's like I said. You are in for a rude awakening when it comes to your girlfriend Lexa!
Ann
